Testosterone Boosters: Boron, Diindolylmethane, Vitamin D
The conclusion on these three ingredients falls in line with what we've previously found; there is v...read more
Anta-Dron is a testosterone booster manufactured by Eclipse Labz. It ranks 215 out of 283 testosterone boosters and earned an overall thumbs-down recommendation based on seven factors including nutrition label transparency, ingredients, dosing, claims, research rating, and ranking.
Anta-Dron earned a thumbs-down recommendation. This recommendation is based on the criteria listed below. To earn an overall thumbs-up recommendation, a product must earn a thumbs-up in at least four of the seven areas below. Click on a graded area for an in-depth analysis.
Graded Area | Thumb Up or Down |
---|---|
Effectiveness Rating | |
Ingredients | |
Ingredient Dosing | |
Claims | |
Research Rating | |
Nutrition Label Transparency | |
Ranking Within Category | |
Overall Recommendation |
1 to 5 Star Rating Votes Votes for products are cast in two ways. First, visitors can rate each product with a 1 to 5 star rating. These votes are cast on a product's rating page (this page - below).
There have been no 1 to 5 star votes cast on Anta-Dron; add yours below.
No email or registration required; click a button below and move on with your life!
There have been no comparison votes cast for Anta-Dron.
The detailed report provides an in-depth analysis of the product's rating. In addition to showing ratings for each area, this report also provides the required criteria for a thumbs-up in each section.
Anta-Dron earned a thumbs-up in this category because its effectiveness rating is 2.00. A product's effectiveness rating must be at least 1.5 to receive a thumbs-up in this area. This effectiveness rating means Anta-Dron is made up of a mix of both high and low-quality ingredients and may lead to some positive results.
This category illustrates how well a product works based on what the research says about its ingredients. Researchers conduct studies on supplement ingredients to gauge effectiveness. The database grades products on how effective their ingredients are. The effectiveness rating of supplement products is evaluated on a 3 point scale: 3.0 is the most effective, 1.0 is the least effective.
Anta-Dron earned a thumbs-down in this category because it contains 0% extremely and/or moderately effective ingredients. A product must contain at least 75% extremely and/or moderately effective ingredients to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
This category rates a product's ingredient makeup. A product should contain mostly extremely and/or moderately effective ingredients with little or no ineffective ones. The database categorizes ingredients as extremely, moderately, or ineffective based on conclusions from research articles.
Anta-Dron contains:
The following table lists all ingredients found in this product as well as their effectiveness ratings and amounts (if listed).
Ingredient | Effectiveness Rating |
---|---|
Broccoli Extract Amount not listed. | 3 out of 3 |
Stinging Nettle Root Amount not listed. | 3 out of 3 |
Green Tea Extract Amount not listed. | 2 out of 3 |
Quercetin Amount not listed. | 1.6 out of 3 |
Black Pepper Fruit Extract (Piperine) Amount not listed. | 1.4 out of 3 |
Diindolylmethane Amount not listed. | 1 out of 3 |
Camellia Sinensis* | not rated |
Grapefruit Extract* | not rated |
Indole-3-Carbinol* | not rated |
White Button Mushroom Extract* | not rated |
Product Effectiveness Rating | 2.00 |
* These ingredients are not included in the Supplement Database.
Note: These ingredients are accurate as of January 24, 2021.
The conclusion on these three ingredients falls in line with what we've previously found; there is v...read more
Anta-Dron earned a thumbs-down in this category because it does not disclose any ingredient amounts on its label making it impossible to gauge dosing effectiveness. Seventy-five (75)% of product's ingredients must be dosed within the effective range to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
This category compares a product's ingredient dosing to effective doses found in research articles and doses used in other products. When researchers study the efficacy of supplement ingredients, they use specific doses. Manufacturers should create products with ingredient doses that fall within established effective ranges.
Anta-Dron does not list ingredient amounts on its label. This makes it impossible to analyze ingredient dosing.
Anta-Dron earned a thumbs-down in this category because 68% of its claims are rated as either extremely or moderately effective. Seventy-five (75)% of a product's claims must be rated as extremely or moderately effective to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
The product’s effectiveness rating is an overall picture of how well a product does or doesn't work. Individual studies research an ingredient's effects on certain claims. For example: does creatine monohydrate increase strength, or does beta alanine improve running performance?
The Supplement Database compiles the conclusions of these studies, and based on a product's ingredient makeup, calculates how well a product does on various claims. The claims below are organized by effectiveness (extremely, moderately, ineffective).
Anta-Dron is extremely effective at:
Anta-Dron is moderately effective at:
Anta-Dron earned a thumbs-down in this category because its research rating is 17. A product's research rating must be at least 60 to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
A research rating of 17 means there is an insufficient amount of research on the product's ingredients to ensure its effectiveness rating is valid.
The research rating is a measure of how much research has been conducted on a product's ingredient makeup. Manufacturers often rely on ingredients without adequate research backing. They may do this to compete with other products that are already using poorly researched ingredients. They may also only use a very small amount of cherry-picked research as a poor justification to use certain ingredients.
The amount of research contained in the database on a product's ingredients determines its research rating. Products with higher ratings are made up of thoroughly researched ingredients.
Anta-Dron earned a thumbs-down in this category because it discloses 0% of its ingredient amounts. A product must disclose all ingredient amounts to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
Nutrition label transparency refers to how many ingredients are listed with amounts on the product label. Many supplement manufacturers hide ingredient amounts under the guise of great-sounding proprietary blends such as "Maximum Muscular Size Enhancer" or "Anabolic Cell Strength Matrix."
When manufacturers use proprietary blends, they can hide ingredient amounts making it difficult for consumers to know whether a product is effective.
Anta-Dron contains:
The label below was generated from the information contained in the database about the product's ingredients and amounts. Actual product labels may differ in appearance.
Anta-Dron earned a thumbs-down in this category because it ranks 215 out of 283 in the testosterone booster category (bottom third). A product must be ranked in the top two-thirds of its category to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
Anta-Dron ranks 215 out of 283 in the Testosterone Boosters category and 3,960 out of 4,483 in the entire database. The table below lists comparisons with similarly ranked testosterone booster. Click on a link for an in-depth comparison between the two.
Product Comparison |
---|
Anta-Dron vs Testo HGH |
Anta-Dron vs Super Test Capsules |
Anta-Dron vs Testo Fuel |
Anta-Dron vs Prime Test |
Anta-Dron vs Test Anabolic Surge |
Manufacturers often create multiple products within the same category. These products are sometimes similar but marketed to different consumers with varying prices. The following table allows you to compare Anta-Dron against its sister products; products manufactured by Eclipse Labz within the testosterone boosters category.
Product Comparison |
---|
Anta-Dron vs MusclePlexx |
See more comparisons: Is Anta-Dron the best testosterone booster?
Graded Area | Reason |
---|---|
Effectiveness Rating | rating is greater or equal to the required 1.5 |
Ingredients | less than 75% of ingredients are rated as effective |
Ingredient Dosing | dosing cannot be rated because all ingredient amounts are hidden |
Claims | less than 75% of claims are rated as effective |
Research Rating | research rating is lower than the required 60 |
Nutrition Label Transparency | does not disclose all ingredient amounts on label |
Ranking Within Category | ranks in the bottom third of category |
Overall Recommendation | received a thumbs down in the majority of areas |
Leave a comment