Testosterone Boosters: Boron, Diindolylmethane, Vitamin D
The conclusion on these three ingredients falls in line with what we've previously found; there is v...read more
2024
November
Project Test by Anabolic Warfare Review
Project Test is a testosterone booster manufactured by Anabolic Warfare. It ranks 51 out of 321 testosterone boosters and earned an overall thumbs-up recommendation based on seven factors including nutrition label transparency, ingredients, dosing, claims, research rating, and ranking.
Thumbs-up
Project Test earned a thumbs-up recommendation. This recommendation is based on the criteria listed below. To earn an overall thumbs-up recommendation, a product must earn a thumbs-up in at least four of the seven areas below. Click on a graded area for an in-depth analysis.
| Graded Area | Thumb Up or Down |
|---|---|
| Effectiveness Rating | |
| Ingredients | |
| Ingredient Dosing | |
| Claims | |
| Research Rating | |
| Nutrition Label Transparency | |
| Ranking Within Category | |
| Overall Recommendation |
Vote Statistics
1 to 5 Star Rating Votes Votes for products are cast in two ways. First, visitors can rate each product with a 1 to 5 star rating. These votes are cast on a product's rating page (this page - below).
There have been no 1 to 5 star votes cast on Project Test; add yours below.
Add Your Vote
No email or registration required; click a button below and move on with your life!
Comparison Votes Visitors can also vote on which product works better on comparison pages. Comparison pages are a side-by-side analysis between two supplement products. The votes below illustrate whether visitors prefer Project Test, or the products listed in the table below. The number next to the thumb up is how many votes Project Test won; the number next to the thumb down is how many votes it lost to the other product.
There have been no comparison votes cast for Project Test.
Table of Contents
Project Test Simple Report
Project Test Detailed Report
The detailed report provides an in-depth analysis of the product's rating. In addition to showing ratings for each area, this report also provides the required criteria for a thumbs-up in each section.
Effectiveness Rating
Project Test earned a thumbs-up in this category because its effectiveness rating is 1.62. A product's effectiveness rating must be at least 1.5 to receive a thumbs-up in this area. This effectiveness rating means Project Test is made up of a mix of both high and low-quality ingredients and may lead to some positive results.
This category illustrates how well a product works based on what the research says about its ingredients. Researchers conduct studies on supplement ingredients to gauge effectiveness. The database grades products on how effective their ingredients are. The effectiveness rating of supplement products is evaluated on a 3 point scale: 3.0 is the most effective, 1.0 is the least effective.
Ingredients
Project Test earned a thumbs-down in this category because it contains 29% extremely and/or moderately effective ingredients. A product must contain at least 75% extremely and/or moderately effective ingredients to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
This category rates a product's ingredient makeup. A product should contain mostly extremely and/or moderately effective ingredients with little or no ineffective ones. The database categorizes ingredients as extremely, moderately, or ineffective based on conclusions from research articles.
Project Test contains:
- moderately effective ingredients: 2
- ineffective ingredients: 3
- unrated ingredients: 2 (the database does not contain information on these ingredients)
- total ingredients: 7
The following table lists all ingredients found in this product as well as their effectiveness ratings and amounts (if listed).
| Ingredient | Effectiveness Rating |
|---|---|
| Shilajit Extract 500mg | 2.3 out of 3 |
| Tongkat Ali 300mg | 2.1 out of 3 |
| Black Pepper Extract 5mg | 1.4 out of 3 |
| Boron 10mg | 1.3 out of 3 |
| Diindolylmethane 200mg | 1 out of 3 |
| Fadogia Agrestis Extract* | not rated |
| Bulbine Natalensis* | not rated |
| Product Effectiveness Rating | 1.62 |
* These ingredients are not included in the Supplement Database.
Note: These ingredients are accurate as of November 09, 2024.
Ingredient Articles
Ingredient Dosing
Project Test earned a thumbs up in this category because 75% of its ingredients are dosed within the effective range. Seventy-five (75)% of product's ingredients must be dosed within the effective range to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
This category compares a product's ingredient dosing to effective doses found in research articles and doses used in other products. When researchers study the efficacy of supplement ingredients, they use specific doses. Manufacturers should create products with ingredient doses that fall within established effective ranges.
Project Test Dosing Compared to Research
This section is a comparison of ingredient doses found in Project Test to amounts used in research articles. The first column contains the name of the ingredient as well as the amount. The second column contains the range of effective doses for that ingredient. Note: not all ingredients in the database contain dosing information; only ingredients with scientific dosing information are included in this analysis.
A green checkmark is shown if the ingredient amount falls within the effective range.
A down arrow is shown if an ingredient amount is lower than the effective range.
| Ingredient & Amount | Effective Range |
|---|---|
| Shilajit Extract 500mg | 500mg |
| Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma Longifolia) 300mg | 100mg - 200mg |
| Boron 10mg | 10mg |
| Black Pepper Fruit Extract (Piperine) 5mg | 60mg |
Project Test Dosing Compared to Other Products
This section is a comparison of ingredient doses found in Project Test to amounts used in other products. The first column displays the ingredient and amount. The second column displays the average amount of the ingredient found across all products in the database. The final column displays the range found across all products in the database.
An orange up or down arrow is shown if the ingredient amount is higher or lower than the average.
An equal sign is shown if the ingredient amount is equal to the average.
| Ingredient & Amount | Average | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Fadogia Agrestis 0.6g | 0.87g | 0.08g - 2g |
| Shilajit Extract 500mg | 219.01mg | 33.33mg - 500mg |
| Bulbine Natalensis Extract 0.5g | 0.44g | 0.03g - 1g |
| Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma Longifolia) 0.3g | 0.19g | 0.01g - 1.2g |
| Diindolylmethane 200mg | 135.55mg | 1mg - 300mg |
| Boron 10mg | 31.36mg | 0mg - 200mg |
| Black Pepper Fruit Extract (Piperine) 0.01g | 0.02g | 0g - 5g |
Claims
Project Test earned a thumbs-down in this category because 42% of its claims are rated as either extremely or moderately effective. Seventy-five (75)% of a product's claims must be rated as extremely or moderately effective to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
The product’s effectiveness rating is an overall picture of how well a product does or doesn't work. Individual studies research an ingredient's effects on certain claims. For example: does creatine monohydrate increase strength, or does beta alanine improve running performance?
The Supplement Database compiles the conclusions of these studies, and based on a product's ingredient makeup, calculates how well a product does on various claims. The claims below are organized by effectiveness (extremely, moderately, ineffective).
Project Test is moderately effective at:
Research Rating
Project Test earned a thumbs-down in this category because its research rating is 17. A product's research rating must be at least 60 to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
A research rating of 17 means there is an insufficient amount of research on the product's ingredients to ensure its effectiveness rating is valid.
The research rating is a measure of how much research has been conducted on a product's ingredient makeup. Manufacturers often rely on ingredients without adequate research backing. They may do this to compete with other products that are already using poorly researched ingredients. They may also only use a very small amount of cherry-picked research as a poor justification to use certain ingredients.
The amount of research contained in the database on a product's ingredients determines its research rating. Products with higher ratings are made up of thoroughly researched ingredients.
Nutrition Label and Ingredient Transparency
Project Test earned a thumbs-up in this category because its discloses 100% of its ingredient amounts. A product must disclose all ingredient amounts to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
Nutrition label transparency refers to how many ingredients are listed with amounts on the product label. Many supplement manufacturers hide ingredient amounts under the guise of great-sounding proprietary blends such as "Maximum Muscular Size Enhancer" or "Anabolic Cell Strength Matrix."
When manufacturers use proprietary blends, they can hide ingredient amounts making it difficult for consumers to know whether a product is effective.
Project Test contains:
- total ingredients: 7
- ingredients with amounts listed: 7
- ingredients without amounts listed: 0
- percent of ingredient amounts disclosed: 100%
Product Label
The label below was generated from the information contained in the database about the product's ingredients and amounts. Actual product labels may differ in appearance.
Ranking Within Category
Project Test earned a thumbs-up in this category because it ranks 51 out of 321 in the testosterone booster category (top third). A product must be ranked in the top two-thirds of its category to receive a thumbs-up in this area.
Project Test ranks 51 out of 321 in the Testosterone Boosters category and 2,590 out of 5,326 in the entire database. The table below lists comparisons with similarly ranked testosterone booster. Click on a link for an in-depth comparison between the two.
| Product Comparison |
|---|
| Project Test vs Mega Test |
| Project Test vs Alpha King Supreme (new formula) |
| Project Test vs Liberty Ballz |
| Project Test vs Raw Signal |
| Project Test vs Rise |
Project Test vs Other Anabolic Warfare Testosterone Boosters
Manufacturers often create multiple products within the same category. These products are sometimes similar but marketed to different consumers with varying prices. The following table allows you to compare Project Test against its sister products; products manufactured by Anabolic Warfare within the testosterone boosters category.
| Product Comparison |
|---|
| Project Test vs Project Bulk |
| Project Test vs Project Hulk |
See more comparisons: Is Project Test the best testosterone booster?
Summary
| Graded Area | Reason |
|---|---|
| Effectiveness Rating | rating is greater or equal to the required 1.5 |
| Ingredients | less than 75% of ingredients are rated as effective |
| Ingredient Dosing | more than 75% of ingredients are dosed properly |
| Claims | less than 75% of claims are rated as effective |
| Research Rating | research rating is lower than the required 60 |
| Nutrition Label Transparency | discloses all ingredient amounts on label |
| Ranking Within Category | ranks in the top two thirds of category |
| Overall Recommendation | received a thumbs up in the majority of areas |
Leave a comment