Which supplement works better to reduce muscle soreness: methylsulfonylmethane (msm) or rice protein?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Rice Protein | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) vs Rice Protein
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to reduce muscle soreness. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows methylsulfonylmethane (msm) is better than rice protein in its ability to reduce muscle soreness. Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) should provide some positive results while rice protein will not.
Confidence Rating: Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) vs Rice Protein
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both methylsulfonylmethane (msm) and rice protein have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.


