Which supplement works better to increase testosterone: mucuna pruriens or zinc magnesium aspartate (zma)?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Mucuna Pruriens | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Mucuna Pruriens vs Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA)
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase testosterone. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence backing up mucuna pruriens is great, while the evidence backing up zinc magnesium aspartate (zma) is good. Mucuna Pruriens should be able to increase testosterone more effectively, however both supplements should provide positive results.
Confidence Rating: Mucuna Pruriens vs Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA)
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA)'s confidence rating is higher than mucuna pruriens's. This means zinc magnesium aspartate (zma)'s effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that zinc magnesium aspartate (zma) works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up zinc magnesium aspartate (zma) is more established.

