Which supplement works better to increase strength: ancient peat and apple extract or creatine nitrate?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Ancient Peat and Apple Extract | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Creatine Nitrate | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Ancient Peat and Apple Extract vs Creatine Nitrate
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase strength. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows creatine nitrate is better than ancient peat and apple extract in its ability to increase strength. Creatine Nitrate should provide some positive results while ancient peat and apple extract will not.
Confidence Rating: Ancient Peat and Apple Extract vs Creatine Nitrate
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both ancient peat and apple extract and creatine nitrate have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.


