Which supplement works better to increase muscle mass: creatine ethyl ester or polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine?

Ratings at a Glance

Supplement	Effectiveness Rating	Confidence Rating
Creatine Ethyl Ester
Polyethylene Glycosylated (PEG) Creatine

Effectiveness Rating: Creatine Ethyl Ester vs Polyethylene Glycosylated (PEG) Creatine

The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase muscle mass. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows neither creatine ethyl ester nor polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine has the ability to increase muscle mass. Neither supplement will provide positive results for this claim.

Confidence Rating: Creatine Ethyl Ester vs Polyethylene Glycosylated (PEG) Creatine

Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.

Both creatine ethyl ester and polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.