Which supplement works better to increase muscle mass: creatine ethyl ester or glycerol monostearate?

Ratings at a Glance

Supplement	Effectiveness Rating	Confidence Rating
Creatine Ethyl Ester
Glycerol Monostearate

Effectiveness Rating: Creatine Ethyl Ester vs Glycerol Monostearate

The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase muscle mass. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows glycerol monostearate is better than creatine ethyl ester in its ability to increase muscle mass. Glycerol Monostearate should provide some positive results while creatine ethyl ester will not.

Confidence Rating: Creatine Ethyl Ester vs Glycerol Monostearate

Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.

Both creatine ethyl ester and glycerol monostearate have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.