Which supplement works better to increase muscle mass: creatine ethyl ester or fish protein hydrolysate?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Creatine Ethyl Ester | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Fish Protein Hydrolysate | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Creatine Ethyl Ester vs Fish Protein Hydrolysate
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase muscle mass. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence backing up fish protein hydrolysate to increase muscle mass is much better than the evidence backing up creatine ethyl ester. Fish Protein Hydrolysate should provide positive results while creatine ethyl ester will not.
Confidence Rating: Creatine Ethyl Ester vs Fish Protein Hydrolysate
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both creatine ethyl ester and fish protein hydrolysate have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.

