Which supplement works better to increase muscle mass: buffered creatine monohydrate or pea protein?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Buffered Creatine Monohydrate | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Pea Protein | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Buffered Creatine Monohydrate vs Pea Protein
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase muscle mass. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. Both buffered creatine monohydrate and pea protein have great evidence backing up their ability to increase muscle mass. They should both provide positive results.
Confidence Rating: Buffered Creatine Monohydrate vs Pea Protein
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both buffered creatine monohydrate and pea protein have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.

