Which supplement works better to improve running performance: coconut water or creatine monohydrate?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Coconut Water | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Creatine Monohydrate | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Coconut Water vs Creatine Monohydrate
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve running performance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows creatine monohydrate is better than coconut water in its ability to improve running performance. Creatine Monohydrate should provide some positive results while coconut water will not.
Confidence Rating: Coconut Water vs Creatine Monohydrate
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both coconut water and creatine monohydrate have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.


