Which supplement works better to improve memory: creatine monohydrate or eicosapentaenoic acid (epa)?

Ratings at a Glance

Supplement	Effectiveness Rating	Confidence Rating
Creatine Monohydrate
Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA)

Effectiveness Rating: Creatine Monohydrate vs Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA)

The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve memory. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows eicosapentaenoic acid (epa) is better than creatine monohydrate in its ability to improve memory. Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) should provide some positive results while creatine monohydrate will not.

Confidence Rating: Creatine Monohydrate vs Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA)

Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.

Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA)'s confidence rating is higher than creatine monohydrate's. This means eicosapentaenoic acid (epa)'s effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that eicosapentaenoic acid (epa) works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up eicosapentaenoic acid (epa) is more established.