Which supplement works better to improve cycling sprint performance: inosine or zinc magnesium aspartate (zma)?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Inosine | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Inosine vs Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA)
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve cycling sprint performance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows neither inosine nor zinc magnesium aspartate (zma) has the ability to improve cycling sprint performance. Neither supplement will provide positive results for this claim.
Confidence Rating: Inosine vs Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA)
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both inosine and zinc magnesium aspartate (zma) have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.
