Which supplement works better to improve cycling sprint performance: creatine monohydrate or golden root extract - rhodiola?

Ratings at a Glance

Supplement	Effectiveness Rating	Confidence Rating
Creatine Monohydrate
Golden Root Extract - Rhodiola

Effectiveness Rating: Creatine Monohydrate vs Golden Root Extract - Rhodiola

The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve cycling sprint performance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. Both creatine monohydrate and golden root extract - rhodiola have good (but not great) evidence showing they may be able to improve cycling sprint performance. Both supplements should provide some positive results.

Confidence Rating: Creatine Monohydrate vs Golden Root Extract - Rhodiola

Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.

Creatine Monohydrate's confidence rating is higher than golden root extract - rhodiola's. This means creatine monohydrate's effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that creatine monohydrate works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up creatine monohydrate is more established.