Which supplement works better to improve cycling sprint performance: adenosine triphosphate (atp) or citrulline malate?

Ratings at a Glance

Supplement	Effectiveness Rating	Confidence Rating
Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP)
Citrulline Malate

Effectiveness Rating: Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) vs Citrulline Malate

The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve cycling sprint performance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows adenosine triphosphate (atp) is better than citrulline malate in its ability to improve cycling sprint performance. Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) should provide some positive results while citrulline malate will not.

Confidence Rating: Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) vs Citrulline Malate

Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.

Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP)'s confidence rating is higher than citrulline malate's. This means adenosine triphosphate (atp)'s effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that adenosine triphosphate (atp) works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up adenosine triphosphate (atp) is more established.