Which supplement works better to improve cardiovascular endurance: creatine malate or phosphorus?

Ratings at a Glance

Supplement	Effectiveness Rating	Confidence Rating
Creatine Malate
Phosphorus

Effectiveness Rating: Creatine Malate vs Phosphorus

The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve cardiovascular endurance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows phosphorus is better than creatine malate in its ability to improve cardiovascular endurance. Phosphorus should provide some positive results while creatine malate will not.

Confidence Rating: Creatine Malate vs Phosphorus

Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.

Phosphorus's confidence rating is higher than creatine malate's. This means phosphorus's effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that phosphorus works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up phosphorus is more established.