Which supplement works better to improve cardiovascular endurance: anthocyanins or highly branched cyclic dextrin?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Anthocyanins | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Highly Branched Cyclic Dextrin | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Anthocyanins vs Highly Branched Cyclic Dextrin
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve cardiovascular endurance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. Both anthocyanins and highly branched cyclic dextrin have great evidence backing up their ability to improve cardiovascular endurance. They should both provide positive results.
Confidence Rating: Anthocyanins vs Highly Branched Cyclic Dextrin
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Anthocyanins's confidence rating is higher than highly branched cyclic dextrin's. This means anthocyanins's effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that anthocyanins works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up anthocyanins is more established.


