Which supplement works better to decrease fatigue: coenzyme q10 or glycine-arginine-alpha-ketoisocaproic acid (gakic)?

Ratings at a Glance

Supplement	Effectiveness Rating	Confidence Rating
Coenzyme Q10
Glycine-Arginine-Alpha-Ketoisocaproic Acid (GAKIC)

Effectiveness Rating: Coenzyme Q10 vs Glycine-Arginine-Alpha-Ketoisocaproic Acid (GAKIC)

The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to decrease fatigue. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows coenzyme q10 is better than glycine-arginine-alpha-ketoisocaproic acid (gakic) in its ability to decrease fatigue. Coenzyme Q10 should provide some positive results while glycine-arginine-alpha-ketoisocaproic acid (gakic) will not.

Confidence Rating: Coenzyme Q10 vs Glycine-Arginine-Alpha-Ketoisocaproic Acid (GAKIC)

Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.

Coenzyme Q10's confidence rating is higher than glycine-arginine-alpha-ketoisocaproic acid (gakic)'s. This means coenzyme q10's effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that coenzyme q10 works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up coenzyme q10 is more established.