Which supplement works better to decrease body fat: polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine or psyllium?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Polyethylene Glycosylated (PEG) Creatine | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Psyllium | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Polyethylene Glycosylated (PEG) Creatine vs Psyllium
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to decrease body fat. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence backing up psyllium to decrease body fat is much better than the evidence backing up polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine. Psyllium should provide positive results while polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine will not.
Confidence Rating: Polyethylene Glycosylated (PEG) Creatine vs Psyllium
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine and psyllium have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.

