Which supplement works better to decrease body fat: grains of paradise (aframomum melegueta) or polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Grains of Paradise (Aframomum Melegueta) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Polyethylene Glycosylated (PEG) Creatine | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Grains of Paradise (Aframomum Melegueta) vs Polyethylene Glycosylated (PEG) Creatine
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to decrease body fat. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows grains of paradise (aframomum melegueta) is better than polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine in its ability to decrease body fat. Grains of Paradise (Aframomum Melegueta) should provide some positive results while polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine will not.
Confidence Rating: Grains of Paradise (Aframomum Melegueta) vs Polyethylene Glycosylated (PEG) Creatine
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both grains of paradise (aframomum melegueta) and polyethylene glycosylated (peg) creatine have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.


