Which supplement works better to decrease body fat: buffered creatine monohydrate or vitamin c?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Buffered Creatine Monohydrate | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Vitamin C | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Buffered Creatine Monohydrate vs Vitamin C
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to decrease body fat. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows vitamin c is better than buffered creatine monohydrate in its ability to decrease body fat. Vitamin C should provide some positive results while buffered creatine monohydrate will not.
Confidence Rating: Buffered Creatine Monohydrate vs Vitamin C
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both buffered creatine monohydrate and vitamin c have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.


