Which supplement works better to increase strength: buffered creatine monohydrate or chromium?

Ratings at a Glance

Supplement	Effectiveness Rating	Confidence Rating
Buffered Creatine Monohydrate
Chromium

Effectiveness Rating: Buffered Creatine Monohydrate vs Chromium

The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase strength. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows buffered creatine monohydrate is better than chromium in its ability to increase strength. Buffered Creatine Monohydrate should provide some positive results while chromium will not.

Confidence Rating: Buffered Creatine Monohydrate vs Chromium

Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.

Chromium's confidence rating is higher than buffered creatine monohydrate's. This means chromium's effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that chromium works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up chromium is more established.