Which supplement works better to increase muscle mass: chromium or creatine hydrochloride?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Chromium | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Creatine Hydrochloride | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Chromium vs Creatine Hydrochloride
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase muscle mass. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence backing up creatine hydrochloride to increase muscle mass is much better than the evidence backing up chromium. Creatine Hydrochloride should provide positive results while chromium will not.
Confidence Rating: Chromium vs Creatine Hydrochloride
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Chromium's confidence rating is higher than creatine hydrochloride's. This means chromium's effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that chromium works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up chromium is more established.


