Which supplement works better to increase muscle mass: alpha-linolenic acid or quercetin?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha-Linolenic Acid | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Quercetin | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Alpha-Linolenic Acid vs Quercetin
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase muscle mass. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence backing up quercetin to increase muscle mass is much better than the evidence backing up alpha-linolenic acid. Quercetin should provide positive results while alpha-linolenic acid will not.
Confidence Rating: Alpha-Linolenic Acid vs Quercetin
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both alpha-linolenic acid and quercetin have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.

