Which supplement works better to increase levels of growth hormone: antler velvet extract or creatine malate?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Antler Velvet Extract | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Creatine Malate | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Antler Velvet Extract vs Creatine Malate
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to increase levels of growth hormone. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows creatine malate is better than antler velvet extract in its ability to increase levels of growth hormone. Creatine Malate should provide some positive results while antler velvet extract will not.
Confidence Rating: Antler Velvet Extract vs Creatine Malate
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both antler velvet extract and creatine malate have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.


