Which supplement works better to improve glucose control: russian tarragon extract or stinging nettle root?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Russian Tarragon Extract | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Stinging Nettle Root | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Russian Tarragon Extract vs Stinging Nettle Root
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve glucose control. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence backing up stinging nettle root to improve glucose control is much better than the evidence backing up russian tarragon extract. Stinging Nettle Root should provide positive results while russian tarragon extract will not.
Confidence Rating: Russian Tarragon Extract vs Stinging Nettle Root
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both russian tarragon extract and stinging nettle root have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.

