Which supplement works better to improve cycling performance: l-citrulline or vitamin b5 (pantothenic acid)?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| L-Citrulline | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic Acid) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: L-Citrulline vs Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic Acid)
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve cycling performance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence backing up l-citrulline to improve cycling performance is much better than the evidence backing up vitamin b5 (pantothenic acid). L-Citrulline should provide positive results while vitamin b5 (pantothenic acid) will not.
Confidence Rating: L-Citrulline vs Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic Acid)
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both l-citrulline and vitamin b5 (pantothenic acid) have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.

