Which supplement works better to improve cycling performance: epicatechin or tryptophan?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Epicatechin | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Tryptophan | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Epicatechin vs Tryptophan
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve cycling performance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence backing up tryptophan to improve cycling performance is much better than the evidence backing up epicatechin. Tryptophan should provide positive results while epicatechin will not.
Confidence Rating: Epicatechin vs Tryptophan
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both epicatechin and tryptophan have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.

