Which supplement works better to decrease body fat: n-methyl-d-aspartic acid or pea fiber?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| N-Methyl-D-Aspartic Acid | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Pea Fiber | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: N-Methyl-D-Aspartic Acid vs Pea Fiber
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to decrease body fat. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows pea fiber is better than n-methyl-d-aspartic acid in its ability to decrease body fat. Pea Fiber should provide some positive results while n-methyl-d-aspartic acid will not.
Confidence Rating: N-Methyl-D-Aspartic Acid vs Pea Fiber
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Both n-methyl-d-aspartic acid and pea fiber have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.


