Which supplement works better to decrease body fat: chromium or zinc magnesium aspartate (zma)?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Chromium | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Chromium vs Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA)
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to decrease body fat. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows zinc magnesium aspartate (zma) is better than chromium in its ability to decrease body fat. Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA) should provide some positive results while chromium will not.
Confidence Rating: Chromium vs Zinc Magnesium Aspartate (ZMA)
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Chromium's confidence rating is higher than zinc magnesium aspartate (zma)'s. This means chromium's effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that chromium works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up chromium is more established.


