Which supplement works better to improve recovery: branched chain amino acids or cordyceps sinensis?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Branched Chain Amino Acids | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Cordyceps Sinensis | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Branched Chain Amino Acids vs Cordyceps Sinensis
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve recovery. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows branched chain amino acids is better than cordyceps sinensis in its ability to improve recovery. Branched Chain Amino Acids should provide some positive results while cordyceps sinensis will not.
Confidence Rating: Branched Chain Amino Acids vs Cordyceps Sinensis
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Branched Chain Amino Acids's confidence rating is higher than cordyceps sinensis's. This means branched chain amino acids's effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that branched chain amino acids works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up branched chain amino acids is more established.

