Which supplement works better to improve cycling sprint performance: arachidonic acid or n-acety-l-cysteine?

Ratings at a Glance

Supplement	Effectiveness Rating	Confidence Rating
Arachidonic Acid
N-Acety-L-Cysteine

Effectiveness Rating: Arachidonic Acid vs N-Acety-L-Cysteine

The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve cycling sprint performance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence backing up arachidonic acid to improve cycling sprint performance is much better than the evidence backing up n-acety-l-cysteine. Arachidonic Acid should provide positive results while n-acety-l-cysteine will not.

Confidence Rating: Arachidonic Acid vs N-Acety-L-Cysteine

Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.

Both arachidonic acid and n-acety-l-cysteine have low confidence ratings. This means neither supplement has an adequate amount of research to back up this claim. A low confidence rating questions the validity of the effectiveness rating.