Which supplement works better to improve cycling performance: branched chain amino acids or caffeine anhydrous?
Ratings at a Glance
| Supplement | Effectiveness Rating | Confidence Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Branched Chain Amino Acids | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Caffeine Anhydrous | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Effectiveness Rating: Branched Chain Amino Acids vs Caffeine Anhydrous
The effectiveness rating is a measure of the supplements' ability to improve cycling performance. This rating answers the question of whether or not a supplement does what it claims. The evidence shows caffeine anhydrous is better than branched chain amino acids in its ability to improve cycling performance. Caffeine Anhydrous should provide some positive results while branched chain amino acids will not.
Confidence Rating: Branched Chain Amino Acids vs Caffeine Anhydrous
Another factor to take into account when comparing supplements is the confidence rating. This rating is a measure of how valid each supplement's effectiveness rating is. Remember, the confidence rating is a measure of how much you can trust the effectiveness rating. This rating is based on how many studies are included in the database on a supplement's claims. Ideally, you want a high effectiveness AND confidence rating.
Caffeine Anhydrous's confidence rating is higher than branched chain amino acids's. This means caffeine anhydrous's effectiveness rating from above is more valid. This does not necessarily mean that caffeine anhydrous works better, it simply means the evidence (included in this database) backing up caffeine anhydrous is more established.


