- Simple Report
- Detailed Report
- Overall Effectiveness Rating
- Research Rating
- Products Containing Huperzine A
- Claim Ratings
Overall Effectiveness Rating
The overall effectiveness rating for huperzine a is 2.7 out of 3. This rating means the evidence is clear on the supplement's ability to deliver positive results. Using this supplement will lead to positive results. Note, this effectiveness rating is for huperzine a as a whole; there are also individual ratings for the claims below.
Read more: What is the effectiveness rating?
Research Rating for Huperzine A
There are 2 studies in the database on huperzine a; the research rating is 30. A score above 80 means the effectiveness rating for this supplement is reliable. A score under 80 means there is insufficient evidence to ensure a reliable effectiveness rating. Note, this research rating is for huperzine a as a whole; there are also individual ratings for the claims below.
Read more: What is the research rating?
Products Containing Huperzine A
|Products Names||Amount of Huperzine A|
|ENGN Shred||Amount not listed.|
|Reactr||Amount not listed.|
|Full list of all 118 products containing Huperzine A.|
The overall ratings above are an average of the individual claim ratings below. Individual claims may have higher or lower ratings compared to the supplement's overall rating. For example, some supplements may have excellent backing for one claim, but be completely useless for another. Click on a claim below for more information.
|Mental Health Claims||Effectiveness Rating||Research Rating|
|improve cognitive ability||improve memory|
The Supplement Database includes 2 studies on huperzine a dosing. These studies indicate an effective dose ranges from 100 to 200 micrograms per day, the average dose being 130 micrograms per day. For a more detailed dosing analysis visit: Supplement Dosing for Huperzine A.
|Title of Study|
|Efficacy of tablet huperzine-A on memory, cognition, and behavior in Alzheimer's disease|
|Huperzine-A capsules enhance memory and learning performance in 34 pairs of matched adolescent students|